It's free. Join us, If you care enough to read the content, post news, stories, add or answer questions on Everyknows.



Log in or Sign Up with your EveryKnows account
By continuing you indicate that you have read and agree to Everyknows
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

© EveryKnows Inc 2018

Welcome to Every Knows

Join the conversation... let's make the world more open and connected.

There's more to discover

"If we would have a new knowledge, we must get a whole world of new questions."
See the best answers from Every Knows..

Hi Guest!! What's on your mind?
Should death penalty be abolished?

Upvote
0
Downvote
0 0 6

Answered: Harry Davies 3 months ago
Freelance digital marketer, DBA

Do you think that the death penalty would prevent crime in your country? Why or why not? Originally appeared on AskOpinion: AskOpinion is a very unique concept and platform that offers instant and relevant responses to your thoughts and queries.


The definition of the death penalty or capital punishment is an authorization to legally end the life of someone as a way of punishment for the heinous crime he/she committed.


The argument that death penalty is the only way to prevent serious crimes such as killing someone as it will induce fear in the minds of criminals does not appear to hold any strong evidence. Many countries have banned the death penalty and studies were undertaken have not indicated any increase in the crime rates. On the contrary, in some countries, the crime rates have reduced.


The law condemns brutal killings at one end, and by awarding a death penalty, the law commits the same crime legally.


It is a legitimate argument that people who have lost their breadwinning members or any other grown-ups from the family due to monstrous crimes have every right to expect a serious punishment to the culprits responsible for their loss. After all, they are forced to live the remainder of their lives with terrible memories with pain and agony. What is the best way of punishment for the killer? By awarding a death sentence, the killer gets an easy way out. 


A rigorous life imprisonment will prove to be a punishment more appropriate rather than awarding a death penalty. He should live to suffer rather than die in a flash for his deadly act. Years in prison with tiresome, hard work imposed on him, together with the deprivation of all the liberties, life will become an extension of his agonies. The offender should repent his gruesome act all through his life till his last breath in this world.


It should be borne in mind that death penalty is not the way of eliminating the crimes, as the priority should lie on wiping out the crimes, not the criminals. In a modern-day civilized society, killing someone by way of punishment raises the question as to how civilized are we in opting such an action.


The major points for an abolition of death sentence:



  1. The killer does not learn anything if he gets killed as well for his gruesome act. He does not get a chance for rehabilitation.

  2. Capital punishment does not discourage criminals from committing crimes. Many studies indicate that the crime rates have not decreased owing to capital punishments.

  3. Capital punishment gives an easy way out for the hardcore criminals whereas life imprisonment teaches them a lesson where living becomes nothing short of hell with all his activities totally cut out and his prison inmates also look at him with hatred.

  4. A death penalty sentence to someone for his dreadful act is more of revenge rather than justice.

  5. It is a rare possibility that an innocent person can get killed by some inadvertent mistakes made in arriving at the final judgment.


Many countries have abolished death penalties and today the number of countries that have opted to abolish the same stands at approximately 140. This clearly demonstrates that the world is moving towards the eagerness to abolish the death penalty, a view shared by all cultures and religions in the world.


The Law Commission of India (Report No. 262 – The Death Penalty, August 2015), recommended that the death penalty is abolished for all crimes other than terrorism-related offenses and waging war.


Conclusion


Non-violence and peace were spread from India to the entire world. It is, therefore, unacceptable to opt for the existence of death penalty as a mode of punishment. Arguably, death should come in one’s life only naturally and not in any other way. The death penalty is something that is against nature, and a law should be enforced more for reformation rather than retribution of the criminal.


The father of our Nation, Mahatma Gandhi’s great quote says that “Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. For a criminal, following his dreadful action, living the rest of his life behind the bars with a massive lonely feeling with no one to look at him sympathetically is a punishment with greater intensity. Also, life imprisonment, instead of death penalty, gives room for the offender to repent his action sometime or the other during his lifetime.  


The death penalty will not bring down the crime rates anyway, and it should be abolished totally.


Upvote
3
Downvote
1 0 share
Answered: Zainab Oriola 3 months ago

I think awarding someone who performed a monstrosity a death penalty is not a good idea.It is not reducing the crime rate at all because most criminals believe that everybody will die at a point so being awarded the penalty is not much of a big deal.I agree that life imprisonment with hard work is the best option.

Upvote
1
Downvote
0 0 share
Answered: Egbo Emmanuel 3 months ago
Medical Student

Truth be told, death penalty is a singular form of punishment that must be discontinued, apart from the fact that no man is able to create life, taking away life is another way of undermining the value of such life.
no matter the offence of an individual, there is always room for change and improvement. In that case, we should seek to rehabilitate the mind of people who do not conform to the established societal rules and/or standards.

In critical conditions, people who are connected to the penalized individual are thrown into grief, and sometimes seek for a way to transfer their grievances upon the society.
Death may end a criminal, but it never ends crime, one may argue that it discourages potential offenders, but it is not always true; the human mind can always do what it is set to do, no matter the amount of stringency.

Upvote
2
Downvote
1 0 share
Answered: Wahab Oriade 3 months ago

in my opinion, I think it should be abolished as it won't end crime but aggravate crime due to the fact that those who are emotionally attached to the victim later find a way to seek vengeance.

Upvote
1
Downvote
1 0 share
Answered: Saeed Shonekan 2 months ago

According to administration of criminal justice act, any act that constitute taking of another life either voluntary or involuntary will require the death penalty but in modern law practices its rare to find such order being carried out to the latter. I do believe that where there is a wrong there is definetly a remedy and to my humble opinion death penalty should not be among the ultimate remedial solution to a capital offence.

Upvote
1
Downvote
0 0 share
Answered: Loni Pan 14 days ago

First, only the most heinous crimes like murder and treason carry the death sentence. There is no straight yes and no to this question because there are different perspectives to look answer it and each has valid points in support. 

For instance, for economic and administrative reasons, the death penalty seems reasonable. People who commit crimes populate the prisons and detention centers. The government cannot built prisons to accommodate every criminal for long durations. It's seems reasonable that perpetrators of heinous crimes should be eliminated. But you would never hear any government cite this advantage.

Another reason is for perceived justice. It would seem right that a person who kills another deserves to lose his own life, right? The victim and his love ones gets justice in a way.

Also, there is the deterrent factor. Society is strongly against heinous crimes and would discourage by having a harsh penalty.

Now here is the other side. If indeed life is sacred and valuable, what gives anyone or body the right to take the life of another even in the name of justice? Are you any better than the man you put on death row? In a less moral perspective, how can a dead man pay for his crime? Death is an escape. Thus there is no justice in the death sentence.

Upvote
0
Downvote
1 0 share
Enter your answer below

Anonymous Mode: No Yes

Discover New People * People You May Like To Follow


Question You May Like to Answer

Question Added . People and life style
Which do you prefer, many friends or just few
Add answer 6 answers -
Answer added . Law
Do we actually need more prisons?
Answered by Anonymous 8 days ago


This is what Nigerian prisons are like. The FG need to invest in the building modern prisons in Nigeria. Everywhere is overcrowding and people ther...... (More)
Add your answer
Post created . Entertainments
Tonto vs Churchill: No Marriage Is Perfect, – Actors Guild Warns Tonto Dikeh, Threaten To Sanction Her
https://www.correctkid.com
Published 04 May

Board of Trustee (BoT) of Actors Guild of Nigeria (AGN) has threatened to sanction actress,Tonto Dikeh over her face-off with ex-husband, ...... (More)
Open in Link Ask Question

Question You May Like to Answer

Question Added . People and life style
What are some unknown facts about men?
Add answer 9 answers -
Answer added . Law
Should death penalty be abolished?
Answered by Harry Davies 3 months ago
Freelance digital marketer, DBA


Do you think that the death penalty would prevent crime in your country? Why or why not? Originally appeared on AskOpinion: AskOpinion is a very un...... (More)
Add your answer
Answer added . Law
Why do women stay silent after sexual assault?
Answered by Peter Mary 4 months ago


My answer would be stigmatism.Especially here in Africa. It would be pointed out by some parents that "Rachel was raped last month and no one has any id...... (More)
Add your answer